Quality Improvement Plan, Resources, and Conclusion
A quality improvement plan is essential in the process of realizing change in the healthcare sector. The first step is to establish the objectives of the improvement plan. Quality improvement requires specific approaches that will address the specific problem. The quality improvement plan requires specific resources to address the healthcare issue (Bonin, 2018). The stakeholders include the healthcare workers that are directly involved in taking care of the children in the healthcare environment. The purpose of the quality improvement plan is to examine the specific interventions, resources, and conclusions.
Quality Improvement Plan
The quality improvement plan will include establishing the improvement goals, identifying the possible strategies, choosing a specific intervention for implementation, and preparing a written action plan. The first step is to establish the objectives of the improvement plan (Corwin et al., 2012). Pain assessment, interventions used, and reassessment is the practice problem that requires quality responses. The healthcare facility should establish goals including administering analgesics and reassessment of pain interventions. Practitioners should use other approaches including home care, pediatric and hospice care, and recording the pain levels (Coury et al., 2017). The goals are important in addressing the pain assessment among children. Nurses should strive to improve plans specific and compatible with their area of work.
Quality improvement requires specific approaches that will address the specific problem. Some of the tools that can enhance the specificity of the problem include run charts, process maps, and fishbone diagrams (Gifford et al., 2016). Nurses should use the run charts to determine if the central tendency is changing or not. Tracking the changes will determine if the approaches taken are making a positive change. A process map will be used to develop a framework for the flow of work. The efforts of the multidisciplinary teams should work towards creating a better environment for the children (Gifford et al., 2016). All the healthcare workers should participate in achieving the target of addressing pain assessment interventions among children.
A fishbone diagram is a tool that healthcare workers should use to address the practice problem. One of the benefits of using the tool in identifying the root cause of a problem. The tool will be effective in identifying the cause of the problem of pain assessment in the nursing practice (Kocman et al., 2019). For example, the tool can help identify the practices or professionals who contribute to the problem among children. Identifying the specific problem is crucial in taking deliberate measures to address the causes.
The quality improvement plan requires specific resources to address the healthcare issue. The stakeholders that will participate in the pain assessment include pediatricians, physicians, charge nurses, and managers (Kocman et al., 2019). Involving the diverse stakeholders is crucial in identifying the specific steps they should take to eliminate the problems. Physicians and pediatricians are crucial in recording the challenges with the pain assessment. The team is involved in the direct care of the patients and thus they have actual data and firsthand experiences with the children (Leis & Shojania, 2017). The team will indicate the steps that can be taken to address the health problem. Another role of the team is to participate in the change improvement process. Pediatricians, physicians, charge nurses, and managers will use the tools to record the pain assessment for a better response (Mannion & Davies, 2018). A healthcare facility should empower the stakeholders with the skills of using the tools to improve the quality of care.
The implementation process will involve timelines for an accurate and specific response. The first step is to identify the scope of the improvement plan. One of the approaches is taking three months to analyze the pain assessment interventions in the pediatrician wards (Mannion & Davies, 2018). Data will be recorded daily for better tallying and analysis of the patterns.
The change process will require the installation of the different tools in the existing computers. The hospital will cater to the licenses from the production companies. Some of the tools that need licenses include run charts, process maps (Mannion & Davies, 2018). The cost is $3000 per software. Another cost complication is a training process for the stakeholders including pediatricians, physicians, charge nurses, and managers. The training will educate the stakeholders on how to develop or study a fishbone diagram. Training the staff for a minimum of three sessions will $3000. The monitoring and evaluation process will take another $2000 to analyze if the interventions are effective in the change process.
Quality improvement is a deliberate approach to examine the stakeholders and the steps they can take to address the problem in the healthcare sector. The stakeholders include pediatricians, physicians, charge nurses, and managers. Involving the diverse stakeholders is crucial in identifying the specific steps they should take to eliminate the problems. The implementation process will involve timelines for an accurate and specific response. Some of the tools that can enhance the specificity of the problem include run charts, process maps, and fishbone diagrams. The expenses will involve paying the licenses to install the software and training sessions for the stakeholders involved in the implementation process.
Bonin, L. (2018). Quality improvement in health care: The role of psychologists and psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 25(3), 278-294.
Corwin, Daniel & Kessler, David & Auerbach, Marc & Liang, Ana & Kristinsson, George. (2012). An Intervention to Improve Pain Management in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatric Emergency Care. 28. 524-8. 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182587d27.
Coury, J., Schneider, J. L., Rivelli, J. S., Petrik, A. F., Seibel, E., D’Agostini, B., … & Coronado, G. D. (2017). Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 1-10.
Gifford, W., Davies, B., Rowan, M., Egan, M., Lefebre, N., & Brehaut, J. A. (2016). Understanding Audit and Feedback to Support Falls Prevention and Pain Management in Home Health Care. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 28(2), 79-85.
Kocman, D., Stöckelová, T., Pearse, R., & Martin, G. (2019). Neither magic bullet nor a mere tool: negotiating multiple logics of the checklist in healthcare quality improvement. Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(4), 755-771.
Leis, J. A., & Shojania, K. G. (2017). A primer on PDSA: executing plan–do–study–act cycles in practice, not just in name. BMJ Quality & Safety, 26(7), 572-577.
Mannion, R., & Davies, H. (2018). Understanding organizational culture for healthcare quality improvement. BMJ, 363.