Task 1: Sustaining Confidentiality within the Age of Public Entry
Within the digital age, the place know-how is extra of a requirement than an possibility, counselors are sometimes confronted with the problem of understanding learn how to successfully handle boundaries. The next case examine will assist college students perceive real-life challenges that counselors typically face relating to boundaries and applied sciences.
Latisha is a 32-year-old African American doctoral scholar in a small, rural college. As a part of her doctoral research, she serves as a supervisor for college students doing their grasp’s in counseling internship. One in all her supervisees, Emma, is working with adolescent ladies throughout her internship and has been assigned 4 shoppers she sees twice per week. Latisha is Fb associates with a number of classmates and former supervisees however has averted friending present supervisees, explaining this coverage in her skilled disclosure assertion.
One weekend, she notices a Fb change between a classmate and Emma whose web page is public and visual. Latisha views Emma’s Fb web page the place she discovers Emma has friended the mom of a consumer and the 2 have mentioned the consumer by means of numerous posts. Emma’s consumer Jenn is a 15-year-old feminine who’s the topic of a bitter custody dispute. Latisha is conscious that Jenn has a 19-year-old African American boyfriend, and the 2 are sexually lively, which conflicts with the mom’s elementary Christian values. Latisha now realizes the mom is a member of her personal church.
The following day, whereas attending church, Latisha is approached by the mom who states that she is aware of Latisha is Emma’s internship supervisor and proceeds to put out the small print of her pending divorce and custody points. The guardian mentions she intends to subpoena Emma and her information as a part of the divorce litigation and desires her to testify to Jenn’s placement and well-being.
Utilizing an moral decision-making mannequin, define your response to this example. Define the proposed motion(s) you’d take on this case, offering justification for the proposed motion(s) and an outline of the decision-making mannequin used to reach at that call. Your decision-making mannequin ought to be one which has been mentioned within the skilled literature, and after explaining the mannequin, you’ll need to supply a rationale relating to why you selected to use that specific mannequin to the case examine. Bear in mind:
- It is best to remember to cite acceptable literature and should give correct credit score to authors of any decision-making fashions used to research the case.
- Don’t merely checklist the steps of the mannequin; apply the steps and remember to doc and defend your programs of motion and your remaining choice.
- Cite all acceptable skilled requirements and related legal guidelines. Whatever the mannequin chosen, it’s essential clearly determine, describe, and consider what moral codes and legal guidelines have been violated. Be particular—use psychological well being statutes and particular moral codes that apply.
Talk about intimately what actions you’d take as you proceed by means of the steps of your chosen moral decision-making mannequin, every of the steps ought to take a minimum of a paragraph (or extra) to deal with. It’s possible you’ll (and are inspired to) reply in a top level view kind (i.e., develop a response to every moral decision-making step); nevertheless, don’t merely checklist the steps of the mannequin however combine them into an entire reply.
Your reply ought to be at a minimal roughly 250 phrases.