Medical care Module – Level 7
Nursing management of newly diagnosed T2RF
Instructions
Mrs A attended the ED with severe hypercapnia, visible use of accessory muscles and unilateral left swelling. She was seen by the A&E registrar and subsequently referred for a bed in Enchanced care unit for proper management and strict observation.
0/0/22
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
Evans, Nirmala
Assessment Information
The student will need to critically analyse and evaluate an episode of nursing care provided to a patient they have cared for. This should demonstrate an in-depth systematic understanding and assessment of the patient as a whole to evidence the application of the knowledge gained on the module in their practice (LO1, LO3).
Students also need to critically appraise the evidence related to this care and demonstrate synthesis of ideas linking your discussion to relevant guidance, tools and frameworks (LO2).
Assessment Weighting: 100% Case Studies
Pass Mark: 50%
Deadline Date of Submission:
Reassessment Date:
Grading Criteria and Feedback Form – Level 7 Case study
Outstanding
>80 Excellent
79-70 Very Good
69-60 Good
59-50 Satisfactory
49-40 Marginal Fail
39-30 Clear Fail
29-20 Little or nothing of merit
19-0
Presentation and structure
10%
Outstanding presentation.
Logically structured.
Highly articulate and fluent writing style.
No grammatical or spelling errors. Excellent presentation.
Logically structured.
Highly articulate and fluent writing style with very few, minor errors. Very good presentation. Logically structured.
Articulate and fluent writing style. A few grammatical errors and spelling mistakes. Good presentation. Logically ordered.
Writing is mainly clear but some spelling and/ or grammatical errors. Satisfactory presentation.
Mostly logical structure.
Not always written clearly and has several grammatical and / or spelling errors. Poor presentation.
Inconsistent or illogical structure.
Has many spelling and / or grammatical errors. Poor presentation.
Very inconsistent or illogical structure
Poorly written and/or poor spelling and grammar. Little or nothing of merit.
Poorly written.
Many inaccuracies in spelling.
Knowledge and understanding
20%
Outstanding exploration of topic showing excellent knowledge and understanding Excellent level of knowledge and understanding demonstrated
Covers all relevant points and issues. Very good level of knowledge and understanding demonstrated. Covers majority of relevant points and issues. Good grasp of the topic and some of its implications presented.
Knowledge and understanding is demonstrated. Covers many relevant points. Satisfactory content / level of knowledge of the topic.
Covers some but not all relevant points. Limited content / knowledge.
Covers few relevant points. Some inaccuracies. Lacking in knowledge.
Content mostly irrelevant and/or inaccurate. Little or nothing of merit.
Content irrelevant and inaccurate.
Breadth / depth and integration of literature
15%
Outstanding breadth and depth of literature utilized. Outstanding integration of literature into work. Excellent breadth & depth of literature utilized.
Excellent integration of literature into work. Very good breadth & depth of literature utilized.
Literature integrated very well. Good use of literature. Depth appropriate to topic but moderate breadth or vice versa. Literature integrated into the coursework reasonably well. Satisfactory use of literature but limited in breadth and /or depth.
Uncritical and cited without comment. Limited breadth and depth Literature cited without comment. Lacks breadth & depth. Some literature irrelevant to topic area. Little or nothing of merit. Literature used irrelevant to topic area.
Critical analysis/
evaluation and/or reflection
50%
Outstanding level of critical analysis/ evaluation and/or reflection.
Highly developed/ focused work. Excellent level of critical analysis/ evaluation and/or reflection on issues. Very good level of critical analysis/ evaluation and/or reflection but a few points would benefit from further development. Good level of critical analysis/ evaluation and/or reflection but some areas could be expanded on further. Satisfactory level of critical analysis /evaluation and/or reflection. Limited evidence of critical analysis/l evaluation and/or reflection. Too descriptive in parts. Lacking / inadequate level of analysis, evaluation and/or reflection. Mainly descriptive. Nothing of merit / unsatisfactory level of analysis, evaluation and/ or reflection. Wholly descriptive
Presentation of references
5%
Recommended referencing system used with no inaccuracies or inconsistencies noted. Recommended referencing system used with very few (minor) inaccuracies and/or inconsistencies. Recommended referencing system used with few inaccuracies and/or inconsistencies. Recommended referencing system used but occasional inaccuracies and/or inconsistencies noted. An attempt to use the recommended referencing system but several inaccuracies and/or inconsistencies noted. An attempt to use the recommended referencing system but many inaccuracies and/or inconsistencies noted. An attempt to use the recommended referencing system but numerous errors noted and inconsistently applied. Little or no attempt to use the recommended referencing system
Essay feedback
Strengths
.
Areas for development
General feedback / additional comments
Learning outcomes achieved: Yes
Within word count limit: Yes
Provisional weighted/overall mark (before application of penalties):
Note: All marks are provisional until the Board of Examiners has ratified them.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
